Area of detection of SU30MK in relation to F-22
Area of detection of SU30MK in relation to F-22
Upgrade to a Premium Account
• Store your photos in a higher resolution and quality.• Ad free browsing.
• Upload 10 times more stuff each month.
Upgrade Now for $4.95 per month!
Comments
Uploaded on April 5, 2008
By Ricardo Pereira
By Ricardo Pereira
Loading..
Viewed 1,367 Times
Rate This Photo










15 Ratings












It's not a F-22, it is a F-35. Seccond: stalth fighter can't be detected with the normal range of radars. The detection range is lower and probabilly and you see the stealth fighter, theres a missile coming to you soon.
Quote:
as for Su-35BM Vs Raptor ,well i think our Flanker would have much better chance in Dogfight than BVR
It looks to be a F35 !
But I love the TVC of Su-30 much more than F-22 :)
as for Su-35BM Vs Raptor ,well i think our Flanker would have much better chance in Dogfight than BVR
Might as well added photon torpedoes to the Su-30, lol
Very cool graphics without any form of scale... not to mention the speed differential (F-22 cming in at M1.6, able to use AB to get to 2.0) and the Su-30 wasting fuel by going full AB all the way. In the most favorable case; mutual destruction, lease favorable: F-22 wing goes split, lower one illuminates for the aim-120, upper one launches at M1.6, upper one gets R-27/R-77 up its ass, blows up, lower one shoots the Su-30's wingman. Last F-22 flies home.
This all ofcourse if they were the only ones in the skies (2 vs 2), but to think that was is retarded anyway.
So no need to listen to this 'Ooh, our neighbors have Su-30s, and we only have Hornets, and we need to project power, so give us F-22s' nonsense. If Australia really wants to conques whole of Oceanea, then develop a fighter yourselves, no need to beg for the F-22. Besides, Israel is more likely to get it then the RAAF, so you're second in either case.
OTOH, Australia needs something with long legs, so basically it's either the Su-35BM, EF-2000 or the F-22.